
A wellness label cannot settle what a health app promises
CAP guidance and the Do Health ruling show why health-app marketers must distinguish product classification from evidence for the benefits advertised.
Read the noteObservations on expert work, intelligent systems and regulated marketing

CAP guidance and the Do Health ruling show why health-app marketers must distinguish product classification from evidence for the benefits advertised.
Read the note
Anthropic’s workforce research raises a problem for regulated teams: automating routine production can also remove opportunities to develop professional judgement.

A neonatal diagnosis study highlights differences in how reviewers handle AI errors, suggesting a more demanding test for human oversight.

The ASA’s enforcement reports expose the work between detecting suspect advertising and establishing that an advertiser has corrected it.

ASA rulings on Finelo and AI Scorecast show why AI advertising must substantiate promises about ease, reliability and financial outcomes.

OpenAI’s Atlassian partnership and Infor’s research raise a question about enterprise AI context: which business information can guide action?

The FTC’s Greenway complaint highlights a pricing gap, with lessons for keeping marketing claims connected to current product facts.

The FCA’s corporate finance survey highlights why compliance needs authority and early involvement to influence commercial decisions.

The FSB’s 12 sound practices challenge compliance teams to establish whether an AI application performs reliably in context, then keep testing that judgement.

Zango’s financial services essay collection raises a question for AI personalisation: how does approval hold when each customer sees different copy?

S-RM’s survey suggests AI speeds up compliance research while context, credibility and relevance still require expert judgement.

MCO’s survey reports an average of 13.8 compliance systems, raising a question about which records should govern a financial services decision.

A study of 12 EU AI Act compliance checkers finds gaps between risk classification and guidance an organisation can act on.

The UK’s healthcare AI reforms point towards lifecycle assurance, with lessons for keeping approvals valid as systems and evidence change.

The ASA’s Juniper ruling shows why intervening pages do not necessarily stop a customer journey promoting prescription-only medicines.

The ICO’s agentic AI consultation highlights why access to personal data does not settle its use, retention or reuse in marketing.

The first edition of brett’s new research programme will benchmark how AI is changing marketing work across UK mortgage lending.

The Midnite ruling shows where generative marketing needs controls: creation, review and publication.

Across four studies, question-framed titles drew less engagement because readers expected them to be less informative.

A negative review can feel more useful while its author seems less credible, depending on what the audience expected.

A less-preferred option can reduce the appeal of a wider proposition, even when customers are free to ignore it.

New research suggests similarity in vocal timbre can shape competence-based trust and persuasion.

An advert can pass content review and still be unsuitable for the conversation in which it appears.

McKinsey respondents widely report individual AI productivity gains, while far fewer report organisation-level financial impact.

AI is changing how content is created and discovered but what comes out still depends on what a brand puts in.

Useful organisational intelligence depends less on retrieving previous decisions than on preserving the expert criteria, reasoning and contextual limits that made them valid.

Regulated advertisers need to show that contextual ad controls worked without seeing the private conversation behind each placement.

Compare nine platforms across rule intelligence, pre-review, approvals, asset management and live monitoring.

As the FCA redraws the boundary around retail protections, marketing teams will need to pay closer attention to context.

New research reveals where AI risk classification and tooling fall short: accountability, human oversight and wider governance.

Employee-generated content can give regulated brands credible expertise and greater reach, but scaling it depends on guardrails that help people exercise judgement—not copy that removes it.

FINRA wants to replace the default principal pre-use approval requirement with risk-based supervision. The opportunity is faster communication; the harder task is proving why each asset received the scrutiny it did.

The EU AI Act’s transparency rules have applied since 2 August 2026, making the relevant obligation, accountable owner and supporting evidence part of the review.

Exhale Coffee supported its marketing with research, laboratory testing and medical expertise. The ASA ruling shows why none of those things, alone or together, creates an authorised health claim.

Research on nearly 3,000 companies shows how the EU AI Act is shaping governance beyond Europe and the evidence behind responsible-AI claims.

The FCA’s latest review finds that collecting management information is not enough. Firms need a traceable path from customer evidence to decisions, action and a measured result.

Lord Vallance has been given direct authority to drive the government’s AI strategy. The harder test is whether evidence and judgement from one deployment make the next easier to govern.

Data reveals where bank marketers are applying AI, how they access it and why the most valuable applications remain the hardest to implement.

Research on AI marketing adoption shows why regulated teams need to examine the workflows around individual tool use.

ONS data shows AI use spreading quickly across UK business. The more valuable task for marketers is turning isolated use into well-governed organisational capability.

BCG's 2026 CMO Survey shows that adopting AI tools is not the same as transforming marketing. In regulated industries, the missing layer is organisational intelligence.

Expertise is increasingly discovered through content. Regulated professionals have a significant opportunity, but publishing at scale changes the demands on judgement, evidence and review.

The Mills Review exposes a weakness in many AI strategies: putting a person in the loop is not enough. Accountable delegation requires a far more deliberate operating model.

The FCA wants firms to make faster, better-evidenced decisions about risk. For marketing and compliance leaders, that demands a better operating model, not lower standards.

The UK’s financial services AI plan reveals that the hardest part of adoption is no longer proving the technology. It is turning regulatory principles into repeatable decisions.